Quote:
Originally Posted by d-null
holy shit gideon you sure know how to reach... 
"good to hear since you consider profiting from porn the same criminal act "living of prostitution" because you don't care about the "loophole" that made it perfectly legal
"?!?! 
what the hell are you talking about exactly, where did ebus say this? (unless you are bringing something in from a different thread)...
anyways, this is just silly talk, and you are just muddying the issue with ridiculous comparisons |
is paying for sex illegal
yes
is paying for sex if you film it for a porn movie illegal
no
one little act of complience turns an illegal act into a perfectly legal act (filming it)
is copyright infringment illegal
yes
is publishing allowing people to post copyrighted material if you comply with the DMCA takedown request illegal
no
that the point when the law turns an illegal act into a legitimate business and it happens to be his business (it fact of law)
when the exact same thing happens and it cost him money its a loophole not a fact of law.
That the point i was making and that is exactly why i put the little
after my statement because your statement is exactly the bias i am talking about.
IT just as bad as the religious right saying all porn should be illegal because the law that made it legal is really just a loophole.