View Single Post
Old 11-20-2008, 03:42 PM  
Machete_
WINNING!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 14,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
but that exactly the point

tell you what next time you plan to film a porno
turn off the camera
pay the girls to have sex with you
invite the cops over to act as a witness and see how quickly you get arrested.

Without the filming of the act, everything else becomes a criminal act.
That loophole turns a normally illegal activity into a perfectly legal business dispite how much the religious right wants it to be otherwise.

The exact same thing is happening here

if the tube sites owner took content they rented from a dvd store
ripped it
uploaded it themselves and invited the cops to witness that act they would also be arrested


but as long let users upload the content AND comply with any take down request
the safe harbor provision turns that into a 100% legal act dispite the fact you don't like it.
No its NOT the same thing.

You can not compare shooting porn to distributing and facilitating the distribution of copyrighted content without the rights to do so.

Its two totally different things.

If what you said was true, why do you think YouTube have had to GEO filter their content? and why do you think YouTube have payed a lot of money to stay out of courtrooms?

Do you really think their million dollar legal advisors would not have saved them those trouble?

Last edited by Machete_; 11-20-2008 at 03:44 PM..
Machete_ is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote