Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
|
The Full part of that section is:
(1) In general. - A service provider shall not be liable for monetary relief, or, except as provided in subsection (j), for injunctive or other equitable relief, for infringement of copyright by reason of the storage at the direction of a user of material that resides on a system or network controlled or operated by or for the service provider, if the service provider -
(A)
(i) does not have actual knowledge that the material or an activity using the material on the system or network is infringing;
(ii) in the absence of such actual knowledge, is not aware of facts or circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent; or
(iii) upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material;
(B) Does not receive a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity, in a case in which the service provider has the right and ability to control such activity
See the part in
bold?
Again - the cases being prepared against them atm. is to prove they are NOT doing enough to prevent this. And its the same section used to fight torrent trackers
Im off to bed - As I said many times before; nothing will change, because Profit is what drives people to break the law