Quote:
Originally posted by NineNine
OK, to get this rolling, I'm suggesting $100-$200/month per webmaster. Any more and you cut out the little guys, and any less, and everybody and their brother will have the same galleries. Anybody know what reviewers are paid? Since everybody would be benefitting, I say that it should be $0 profit to the organizer(s) (if any), with all of the money being pooled to pay the reviewers. The actual code to do it would be neglible (I'd do it for free).
|
I'm not sure that charging is necessarily necessary or benefitial. The way I see it, the small guys do the reviewing in exchange for access to the galleries. And the larger guys get free access because without some serious traffic we're not going to attract the quality and quantity of gallery submissions required.
What's the advantage of charging?