Quote:
Originally posted by NineNine
Interface-wise, I think that a really simple form should be set up for the reviews that pulls up their categories and lets them do a simple approve/reject for each gallery that goes directly to the DB.
|
Good suggestion
Quote:
|
Also, the actual resulting galleries should probably just be sent out in an agreed upon format. I'd think that something like a comma-delimited file with URL, # of pics (or movies), and description that everybody can use. (Just set up a daily job that emails to the members)
|
Yes, this is what I had in mind. Anyone have any comments re what would be the most useful format for the files? And should it be an attachment?
I'd also like to explore the viability of having our system submit directly to the submission forms of the most popular TGP scripts. This feature would make the co-op an extremely automated system. If someone wanted support for a less popular script we could perhaps make the necessary modifications for a fee to be paid to the programmer.
Quote:
|
There needs to be some kind of requirements to review and approve,
|
Agreed.
Quote:
|
say 10 galleries a day per category,
|
Sound good to me.
Quote:
|
with leeway for x days per month or year off for vacations, illness, etc. But after that level, that person should get bumped for someone else (if there is someone else) waiting to jump in.
|
Agreed. How about a requirement to review no less than 300 days PA and a requirement that you be prepared to spend at least 65 days covering for reviewers on leave?
It should be the responsibility of the reviewer to find their own replacement and anyone who misses more than 3-days a year without arranging a replacement should get the boot.
Quote:
|
Also, should all TGP owners involved be required to either link to the co-op in their webmaster section?
|
Yes I had the same thought. I was thinking about requiring participants to add a prominant link to their submission thankyou page.