Quote:
Originally Posted by Twistys Tim
The biggest problem with an 'inside job' theory is the secrecy that would be required from the countless people involved in planning and executing this kind of attack.
The CIA established TOP SECRET prisons in Eastern Europe, and we knew about them withing about 18-months. These were sites so secret, that the only people who knew they existed were the CIA top brass, the politicians who authorized there existence, and he CIA personnel who were torturing prisoners at the TOP SECRET prisons. And yet, we found out about them within a very short time frame.
The kind of demolition you have claimed occurred at WTC7 would have required the use of outside civilian contractors to rig the building, and it would have required the residents of the building (ordinary people) to either be unaware or to turn a blind eye (be complict) to the rigging of their place of employment for demolition. Furthermore, everyone on the inside of this job would have to stay silent forever. All of this is highly unlikely. What about the janitor of WTC7...? Is he on the inside of this job, and has been paid of enough to secure his silence FOREVER. Not likely -- he would have had to have been killed, along with everyone who witnessed the planning and preparation for the demolition (secretaries, security guards, secret service agents, cleaners, receptionists, mail room clerks, etc. etc. etc.) They would have all had to be killed.
|
Why would you need "countless people" to do that? If Al Qaida did it, they did it with 20 people. And if they could keep it a secret while planning why wouldn’t some other group be able to do the same?
I am pretty sure CIA and FBI knew about the attack before it happened but I don't know if they actually helped. It wouldn't surprise me if they did. But to say it is impossible because it would take "countless people" to plan and execute the plan is stupid. Again, if Al Qaida could do it with 20 people why wouldn't some other group be able to do the same thing?