|
The problem as I see it with the endless speculation about what brought down the WTCs, or did a plane hit the Pentagon, and other 911 theories is that they are designed in essence to prevent any proper discussion about what actually happened on 911. 911 Truthers will spend eternity discussing and arguing about every unknown aspect of 911, speculating and theorizing about virtually everything, except the known facts.
I have yet to see a discussion by 911 Truthers about the traceable money sent from the Pakistani security services to Mohammed Atta before the 911 attacks, but they will squabble and argue endlessly about structural engineering, melting point of steel, controlled demolitions, physics, or anything else except the facts.
The same goes for the Pentagon attack. The 911 Truth movement claims there was not a plane involved and place the blame on a cruise missile, black flag operation, and Dick Cheney. Clearly, it is beyond any stretch of the imagination to think that US military personnel would launch an attack on their own unarmed people. Dozens of US military personnel would have had to be involved in the firing of a cruise missile against the Pentagon, and it is highly unlikely that they would be complicit in the murder of their compatriot's. But still the 911 truthers will argue that a plane did not hit the Pentagon, a cruise missile hit it because they know so much about puncture holes, the intensity of jet fuel burning versus high explosives, trajectory, aviation, and all other specialized subjects they are experts on.
|