View Single Post
Old 12-18-2008, 03:25 PM  
Zombaio_Tomas
Confirmed User
 
Zombaio_Tomas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Zombaio.com
Posts: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kimmykim View Post
LOL, you don't know me well enough to like or dislike me, but thanks

Back to the business end of it, there is no such thing as an indirect 5967 transaction. Transactions are assigned an MCC based on the type -- ie internet, terminal swiped -- and the content -- airline ticket, porn site, book to be delivered with signature.

Transactions are not "transferable" to another code... for instance, a purchase made in a strip club with a swiped (or keyed) card has one code assignment. If the same company had websites that sold subscriptions, they would be a different code assignment, run on a different MID/TID setup. Interspersing those transactions is NOT ALLOWED.

As to the comment about worrying about competition, you'll find that I'm friendly with, and have tremendous respect for the legitimate billing companies in the industry. CCBill, Epoch, Netbilling, L3 Payments, and CommerceGate jump to mind immediately (and I'm not saying that all others are not legitimate) and I have personal friendships as well as the occasional business relationship with many of them.

Amazingly enough, in a couple of months, I will have been in the adult industry for ten years, almost all of those dealing with billing and payment solutions -- I don't have to hate on anyone, my clients have always gotten paid on time and in full.
Good for you kimmy, I've been in the billing industry since 2001 so i'm not new to this. I have never stated that is such thing as an indirect 5967 transaction so I don't know what to answer here...

Love to be on your friendly list but I guess we never will...
__________________
Zombaio_Tomas is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote