Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Doctor
Yeah things like cascading, being able to pay per signup, fraud detection, different payout tiers, x-sale integration, tracking which tours and join pages are converting better.......these are "minimal" benefits. 
Yeah, having RSS feed and FHG capability is what's going to "make them", not the 5% rate.....because apparently the difference in processing fee wouldn't be enough of a $$ difference for you to buy NATS. 
I love how you think some processors are useless because they don't have built in affiliate tools to cater to the small fish. It's amazing sometimes to see the different thought processes of small fish versus large ones. |
Oh? What qualities define the apparent success of CCBill as compared to other processors? They all have the same rates so it can be argued that it's the services.
So if you are using IPSP's for processing why bother with NATS? I can tell you the benefits of cascading amongst IPSP's is minimal, and I am already aware that some of the IPSP's are integrating NATS like tools and queries into their backends.
The point I am trying to make is that if you are running an IPSP it would be beneficial to consider this. I think an IPSP that can provide these tools and geniune third party accountability in their numbers would be quite a breakthrough as far as affiliates are concerned. There is a real need for this.
And the big guys who are running NATS and doing X-sales are not even reading this thread or worried about 5% rates from an IPSP, it's a different business model, indeed a different business altogether.