Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronM
How about a link to an attorney who can assist you though?
J.D. Obenberger
(url removed)
|
Thanks. His redlined, two-column comparison is quite a good resource. So far I have not produced anything containing "an actual human being engaged in actual or simulated sexually explicit conduct..." so at least under the old rules, full 2257 compliance is not required... smart to maintain documentation, but not required.
We'll all have to determine what "lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area" means. I do have a bit of stuff that might cross that line... or it might be art.