Quote:
Originally Posted by ladida
I see nothing wrong with the picture, not sure what you people are trippin' over. I've seen 100 of you post "fucking hot" on absolutelly horrible girls, but this one is suddenly bad? Bandwagon whores i say. The pose the picture is in may not be the most usuall one, but it's most likelly a part of a serie of shots, and having constantly same poses, on same couches and chairs in same clothes gets a little old. Otherwise, picture clarity and color is one of the better ones posted around.
|
There are lots of things wrong with the picture and the shooter is copying others work without truly understanding what he's doing. The cropping is bad, bot in the picture and shooting. The model is not coming on to the camera. The clothing hits me as Wal-Mart and Playboy should scream Gucci. The tits hanging down is a shot for mega boobs girls and even if this girl is one the shot does not show it. The lighting on the eyes is wrong, it should show her eyes. And as for the cheap plastic ring on her thumb!!!!!!!!
That's for starters the post production work is just as awful. The picture is terrible and smacks of someone being employed on a price.
Dean is spot on and for Playboy it's not good enough.