Quote:
Originally Posted by Sagi_AFF
I don't care who's fault it is for a fail agreement. There is no justification to pick up arms at that point. They could have continued talking. They could have come back to the table in a month, two months, etc. Israel had made the best offer the Palestinians had ever seen. What was the response? Violence.
And now you say Israel should respond to the violence with talks.  |
Maybe it was a good offer, but why does that mean they have to take it? "It's the best offer you'll get. Take it or leave it."
Well frikken hell, Jerusalem being a big contender, why not give the east side including their mosque? *This* was the one of the major reasons for failure - Israel would not budge on Jerusalem. Why not?
and then there's the refugees.... why refuse their return?
I don't recollect any reason's for not giving either....
It's all fine and dandy to say that you are offering an olive branch, but what happens when you don't have an ear on the ground and you accept it?