Quote:
Originally Posted by leek
So... then you agree? That was the point of my argument. You can say "technically" if you want, but CSS (the technology) doesn't have any benefit on SEO.
I don't think you understood the point of my post. I do only CSS based designs, tables are for tabular data. I am not downplaying the importance of CSS, but using it for the sole purpose to improve SEO is ridiculous and just plain wrong. Re-read my post: valid and standards compliant HTML, proper use of tags for semantic purposes, clean/uncluttered markup - all of this is what is important for SEO, not CSS.
[ citation needed] |
Dude...
Don't bother trying to explaine the whole CSS/Table thing.
Right now CSS is an excellent sales pitch and the whole SEO/CSS thing is very important to the sales pitch these days.
I Initially came out and said CSS /Table makes no difference to SE's. Horrible code is horrible code I linked a few articals and showed that SE spiders read the text of a website, not the mark up. SOmehow my information was takin as an afront to all that is sacred to these punks that aspire to dissect every fucken letter I type.
Do not try and be reasonable it's viewed as a weakness to these pigs...