Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam
Clinton didn't pay off the national debt or control the deficits. He just changed the way the numbers were calculated.
|
More was done during those years than merely "changing the way the numbers were calculated" and you know it. There was no kind of debt showing in '99 like there is now, or like there was in '93.
Quote:
Originally Posted by onwebcam
The whole point to it all is we don;t have to have the Federal Reserve handling our nations money. It's a private company that charges us interest to create our money. We pay them to do nothing and they control us by doing this. In addition and contrary to popular belief ALL of these bail outs buying up assets aren't being held by the government. They are being held under private holding companies set up by the Federal Reserve. So we are giving them the power to buy up everything in the US and paying them to do it.
|
I'm not sure what you want everyone here to do about it. :D
Obama's going to spend money, we get it. Tell me, would McCain have halted all government spending? I doubt it. My question is do you think the country will be better or worse off after 8 years of Obama? You obviously think it's going to be worse, I get that too.
Anything new to add?
I just have trouble accepting when someone says any new debt that Obama racks up is going to be America's downfall all the while completely ignoring the existing debt which was as we all know compiled by you-know-who and co. It's... well... insufferably stupid really.