Quote:
Originally Posted by stickyfingerz
My girl self lubricates so no need for lube or mayonnaise.
Do you think Netflix chose to go streaming only for their online rentals in order to keep the 56k crowd happy?
Customer satisfaction eh? My favorite analogy is the rental car one. I would be VERY satisfied if I could walk into enterprise car rental, pay 39.00 for a days rental and keep the car too. If they gave me a free car every time I rented one, I would be very unsatisfied if I could not keep the brand new car the next time I rented. You are right.
HOW DARE they not satisfy me by not giving me a 20,000.00 car.
Wait that analogy seems silly. Who would give away a car for 39.00? Well how much money do people think programs spend on their content? Customer satisfaction ends, when satisfying the customer is hurting your business, and there are other customers plenty happy to pay 29.00 to VIEW your content, rather than keep it, you go after the customers happy with just viewing.
Wastes breath....
|
You're missing a minor point: the competition is already doing it in adult.
Genies do not easily go back into bottles. Any adult company that decides not to offer downloads effectively delivers a lower standard of service than the bulk of the competition. Meanwhile, that same company will still suffer from the illegal competition that tubes with user uploads create.
Switching to a streaming-only model could work if all major programs did it at the same time. However, most won't. There's a reason for that
