Quote:
Originally Posted by JaneB
My website is not dull pal. I have way better content then your sorry ass looking website has. I run my website by myself and work my ass off on it. Stop being such a bitter bitch. All those other websites that are ranked in January's top ten work their asses off too. Perhaps you should try that instead of crying on here all the time. Jackass.  |
Then make the scoring criteria "how much ass has the webmaster left" !
Instead we have this scoring of content / navigation / other score / which is just complety nonsensical allowing the review site to give whatever score they want.
If a site is hot and good value for money what more is there to be said ?
If they charge a one off fee? Why are they penilised for less updates?
I assumed that this was just to get the traffic to the better paying programs. If not it is plain stupid.
Review sites could be a great source of strength in the industry supporting the creative and original, giving the punter confidence to part with his money, pointing him to new delights.
Sadly most review sites seem content to send their traffic to the same old 20 sites...and seem to rig the criteria to do it.