Quote:
Originally posted by UnseenWorld
Well, are you going to draw some sort of parallel, because this is no argument. It might be a setup to an argument, but it's not an argument. This is premise A, we stand in need of premise B and the conclusion.
|
I see. So you get to draw all the paralells you'd like, but when I do it back.. its syllogism time.
hahahahahaha
I wasn't drawing a paralell in the first place. Precedent is a valid legal argument. I was simply showing that there is legal precedent for justifying the ending of a life for less than "extreme" purposes.