View Single Post
Old 02-13-2009, 03:24 AM  
pocketkangaroo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 8,452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Doctor View Post
The article I linked to earlier addressed this. Of course we want the money spent on worthwhile projects......the problem is that time is of the essence.
A high speed rail system or new electric grid take years to plan, and the economy needs the stimulus yesterday....so they funded all the worthwhile projects they could find that were ready to go "NOW", and yeah, the rest of the money went to pet projects that have been waiting for an opportunity to get funding.

Like I said before, if republicans were in charge the price tag would be the same except the money would be spent on weapons systems the Pentagon doesn't want or need, prisons instead of schools, abstinence education instead of condoms, etc.

The more important thing was that the spending start quickly and the money starts working it's way through the economy now.

That's why I said if the Dems play games with the regular budget where they do have time to deliberate and hold hearings and make each program survive on it's own merit....then I'll agree that they're no better than the republicans.
For the stimulus though, they get a pass, because they had to spend a certain amount and do it quickly, so they went and grabbed projects that had been sitting on their desks for awhile now that were ready to go. That's just the way this one went down.

The republicans BTW had a chance to be part of the process, but if you're going to offer amendments, get them accepted, and then not vote for the final bill....then of course the conference committee is going to strip your amendments out. You don't get to play unless you have skin in the game.
This time, they chose to be naysayers and now have to hope the economy gets worse or else their minority is going to continue to shrink.
Some people, like myself would rather save the pet projects for another time. Perhaps a time when the country isn't massively in debt. Why not just look at the bill objectively and agree that some of that shit is completely unnecessary?

And the reasoning for the pork is pretty sad. The "we'll spend money on stupid shit but it won't be as bad as the stupid shit that Republicans spend on". It's like shitting on someone's floor and then telling them it's good because at least it's not in their bed.

I just wish some of you guys would stop the whole game. This should be about doing what's best for the American people, not "beating the Republicans". Partisians would rather see the country go to shit if it means they can get some political victories out of it. It is what is turning Washington into the cess pool it is.
pocketkangaroo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote