Originally Posted by gideongallery

you two really need to hire better lawyers because this is probably the stupidest statement ever.

the tube site knows the advertiser is supporting the uploads so they can let it go with watermarking.

However everything else could be a program, trying to leach traffic without paying or someone who stole the video and replace the watermark with their own (to leach traffic) or (this is the protected one) a "fair use" use of the content.

the only one who would not care about having to remove the watermark would be the last one.