View Single Post
Old 02-14-2009, 05:51 AM  
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by mynameisjim View Post
Gideon, have you spoken to a tube owner about advertising?

It's not a program blocking certian uploads. It's a person.
and i am telling you that it doesn't matter
do you really think that youtube blocking nudity is done with a program
it done by a person
blocking kiddie porn would fall in the same catagory.
Neither invalidate the safe harbor provision (see the veoh case)
they can set a rule (no watermarks unless you are a sponsor)
and as long as the rule has a bases in protecting fair use (see my example) they are protected by the safe harbor provision.
they don't have to be a promotional vehicle for non paying content providers to be protected by the DMCA
that would violate the very premise of the DMCA safe harbor provision.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote