Quote:
Originally Posted by MaDalton
harrassing legit producers is not the way to success, no one of us shoots underage porn (at least i hope so). and girls like Tracy Lords are not the problem, it's babies and kids between 0 and 12 years.
you need to attack CP on the billing level - why do russian (or wherever) based billing companies show up that process CP sites with Visa or Mastercard?
and ISPs would need to do more - although this is a dangerous topic since they can easily be used to block legit porn as well once they start censoring. but why is it possible for example that still newsgroups exist where CP is uploaded every day and you can access everything for $9,95 a month?
but whatever you do - it will never go away, you can just make it as hard as possible to access
|
Again let me be clear I'm not defending the government or this statute....just a bit of devil's advocate because I can't think of a better way to do it than their way...even though I agree totally there are alot of problems with their way.
Attacking CP on the billing level. How do you decide what is and what isn't CP without age verification?
Sure the obvious stuff can get weeded out, but there is alot on the fringes...there are 16 years olds who look 25 and 25 year olds who look 16.
How do you know whose billing to cut off and whose not to?
Also, alot of this stuff isn't done for profit. It's traded freely....but how can you arrest those guys when you can't prove the model was underage?
At least with 2257, if you can't prove she was underage, you can jail the offender for not gathering the required records before producing the porn.