Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Doctor
So what you're saying is that the part of the law you don't like is the secondary producer provision?
What if the primary producer is outside of the U.S., but the secondary producer is in the U.S.?
Wouldn't showing a primary producer custodian of records address outside the U.S. be all that anyone needed to publish child p*rn without any consequences?
Again, remember I'm speaking from the point of view of a government official who wants to protect children and eliminate child p*rnography. (not the point of view of a pissed off webmaster who is being inconvenienced)
How can I do that if there are no age verification records to prove the models are/were of age?
|
well that was one of my problems
however that can be solved with a requirement that to be complient there must be a primary producers designated within country. IF you buy from a foreign country producers either they setup ONE designated authoritiy for thier stuff, or release the docs openly and publically.
Since EVERYONE will not do that (ie canadians who have to worry about privacy rights would have to take the designate position) it would significantly reduce the administrative load of such a change.
IT much better than FORCING it to every secondary producer, and creating the wasted duplicate checks.