Quote:
Originally Posted by aniloscash
I still think the basic issue here is innocent until proven guilty. and if you have a paysite or produce content you need to have id's and releases. but the basic issue is if you require 2nd producer to have 2257 docs you end up violating the basic right to privacy that these models and actors have. That their private information like home address and real name be given to any one operating a website. That just doesnt make sense.
|
The new regs say redacted IDs are ok, so the only thing at issue is their legal name and date of birth. The records are only being provided to people who have a business relationship with the primary producer.....and nobody is forcing the performers to perform. They gave up their ID and signed a release when they got paid.
The courts would also say that protecting children is more important than protecting the privacy of people who are voluntarily performing in pornography.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
ok then you tell me how does pulling agents off sting operations that would catch pedo, and putting them on checking the id of 40 year old milfs 50 times over going to reduce kiddie porn.
|
Again just playing devil's advocate here....but judicious use of government resources isn't the topic of discussion here.
The topic is, do you have a
better way of preventing child pornography and prosecuting those who engage in it?
I see alot of bitching and moaning about this and that and the other with the current law, but I have yet to see anyone offer a better alternative.
The reason this is important is if you look at laws like the Communications Decency Act and Child Online Protection Act. The court ruled that filtering software was a better and less intrusive way to protect children from viewing pornographic and other age innapropriate materials.
The court will always agree that the government has a compelling interest in protecting children....what you have to show is that there is a better and less intrusive way to do that than the one the government is currently trying to use.
