Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
see this is the gun control debate all over again, enforce the laws that are on the books already, fully fund the impementation of those laws BEFORE writing new laws with increased resource requrements.
the problem is the government is not thinking straight, they didn't have the resources to resolve the issue under the original law and they changed the law to shift the burden to the secondary producers. The problem is that the law doesn't do that it increases the burden on the enforcement.
Better solutions.
Optional registration on a person bases so that MILF would only need to get id checked once for every movie they act in (see aim)
primary producers within the country being designate for all licienced copies of movies so that each liciencee would not have to be checked
foreign producers would be required to at least setup a designated agent of record within country
take all the money that has been wasted fighting the adult industry in court and all the money used to do all those extra redundantly wasteful checking
use it to hire more agents to do sting operations to catch pedos
|
If you read the court decision, you would understand why only needing ID's for models who "looked young" won't work.
This is what you're not understanding. You talk about enforcing laws already on the books, and that CP was already illegal.
You can't prove CP took place unless you have records. The CP laws are basically unenforceable without 2257 (except in the obvious cases where really young people are used)...but for anyone who is past puberty, you can't know for sure....so records are necessary.
The govt is thinking straight as far as I can tell....you're the one not thinking straight. You're thinking in terms of what would be best for you, not in terms of what will allow the government to prevent CP and in the event it does occur, prosecute those responsible.
You still haven't shown me a better way for the govt to do that.