Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Doctor
If you read the court decision, you would understand why only needing ID's for models who "looked young" won't work.
|
again i am not saying "looks young" would be the criteria for the OPTIONAL model "super id"
say something like a year which you must have been born before.
each year you bring the year forward one
so in year 2000 anyone who was born before say 1975 could get a super id
in 2001 anyone born before 1976 and so on.
It would eliminate all the redundant checking that the government officials would have to do by all the models who fall in that catagory.
IT would create an economic insentive to producing older niche porn (milf) because there would be less legal paper work, and therefore more profit.
Quote:
This is what you're not understanding. You talk about enforcing laws already on the books, and that CP was already illegal.
You can't prove CP took place unless you have records. The CP laws are basically unenforceable without 2257 (except in the obvious cases where really young people are used)...but for anyone who is past puberty, you can't know for sure....so records are necessary.
The govt is thinking straight as far as I can tell....you're the one not thinking straight. You're thinking in terms of what would be best for you, not in terms of what will allow the government to prevent CP and in the event it does occur, prosecute those responsible.
You still haven't shown me a better way for the govt to do that.
|
ok so tell me how giving "super id" system for people who were 25 years and older in 2000 prevent one CP case from going forward.
every person checking one of those old models ids is a person who could be working on catching a pedo so i can clearly see who not doing it let more kiddie porn to exist.