Quote:
Originally Posted by Pleasurepays
no you fucking idiot. this whole situation is about the children... not a backwards, retarded, crazy woman and what she does or doesn't do on film. 14 lives are already on track to end up in the shitter and a stereotypical bunch of jackass pornographers think its a clever idea to exploit that as a means for getting publicity to a failing porn company.
you think your clever with your "fuck the man" outlook on life and childish, selfish reasoning and that's exactly what makes this industry such an easy target to begin with... the fact that its an industry full of dysfunctional morons with zero sense of how they are being perceived by people who actually, vote, organize and wield the power to make laws and shut you down.
|
Yes, exactly its about the children. And since we live in the real world its about paying for raising the children. A legal company offered a legal contract to a woman to do something legal. It's up to her if she wants to do it. If she does not have a moral objection to porn and feels this is a good offer she'll take it. If she doesnt, she'll pass. It's not up to you to pass judgement on her or Vivid.
And you have yet to actually say why this would "ruin" those kids lives. Because their mother did 1 porn shoot? Please. If anything its the opposite, the million dollars would allow them to live a life of some normalcy versus the alternative. And please get out of your shell and take a look around. Plenty of porn stars and models in this industry have children or are raising children. Most likely you are promoting them so once again take your hypocritical ass and
On a side note, she should pass on the Vivid offer, hire a publicist and shoot for TLC or one of the other reality starved networks. Show she's not entirely batshit and after awhile start pushing Gerber and Pampers.