Quote:
Originally Posted by WiredGuy
if sextube was too generic, i'm sure CIPO/USPTO would have denied the tm application.
WG
|
Sorry, but you are completely incorrect with that assumption.
I could cite dozens of completely generic worthless trademarks to convince you, but I don't have the time.
How about one case in point, remember voyeur.com?
Shap's trademark claim for "sex tube" is worthless. He just doesn't know it.