Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeCreep
Sorry, but you are completely incorrect with that assumption.
I could cite dozens of completely generic worthless trademarks to convince you, but I don't have the time.
How about one case in point, remember voyeur.com?
Shap's trademark claim for "sex tube" is worthless. He just doesn't know it.
|
the ignorance in this thread is astounding.
its not about YOUR opinion... its about what US Law, international law, ICAAN and the WIPO thinks.... and there is no such thing as a "worthless trademark" anymore than there is any such thing as a "worthless patent" - either it exists or it doesn't. if it exists, its valid until found to be invalid in a court of law in some particular jurisdiction.