View Single Post
Old 03-16-2009, 09:02 AM  
Xxaru Media
Confirmed User
 
Xxaru Media's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: MIA
Posts: 255
Quote:
Originally Posted by pornlaw View Post
You should read 28 CFR 75.... the way records should be maintain is with the least amount of unnecessary information. If you are going to be inspected, having anything other than the required docs in your records may be a violation of 2257.
Could you post up the wording that says this? I've looked over this doctrine a number of times now and it's quite possible that I'm missing it, but I just don't recall seeing anything that specifies this. I've been using a joint release w/ 2257, and I'm going to re-write them separate now because after thinking about it I do feel it makes more sense to do it that way (and it's always good to play it safe). But I really don't see how it makes any difference from a legal standpoint if it's not stated in the doctrine that it HAS to be done that way.
Xxaru Media is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook