GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

UnseenWorld · 04-03-2003, 07:13 PM

Steffie wrote:

Over the past 7 years on the net I noticed that..

More and more girls are perfect looking. When most of us amateurs started out in 95-96 there wasn't much in adobe, digital photography etc.

How does this affect our young men?

My reply is:

I'm in no respect a young webmaster, but I have some comments to contribute.

Standards in modeling are high, and are not driven by webmasters but by the market. Back in the beginnings of modern porn, in the 60's and 70's, porn "models" were mainly 25-to-30ish hookers or hippies (and looking at vintage porn from that period, you can usually guess which of those pools the model came from). Today, the girls I shoot are usually 18-to-20ish college coeds. Or course, my work is largely devoted to "natural" girls, not showgirls, pornstars, or "babes," so maybe the girls I shoot are not what you are talking about.

Contrary to the doctrine and wishes of the feminists, certain standards of beauty seem to be ingrained or "hard-wired" and are not as "cultural" as once thought. Given a choice between two strange women, a baby will almost invariably crawl toward the one with the face that is more conventionally beautiful. Proponents of a certain fetish area aside, men almost universally prefer young women to more mature women as sex partners. Speaking for myself, working with attractive and naked young women all the time probably has had an effect on me. I cannot find many women anywhere near my age (57) attractive. We can be friends and even very close friends, but do I have sexual desire for any women near my age? None.

Nothing could be more human than to seek perfection, and perfection in terms of physical beauty is an enjoyment unto itself, merely in the observation.

And here I'm speaking of the part of the adult world which is devoted to beauty. I'm not speaking of the fuck and suck area, which I happen to feel is perverse. If that part of the adult world were to disappear overnight, I would not shed a single tear.

Steffie wrote:

Yeah reckon a lot of them have money, but most of you guys are overweight and really have no clue how to treat women.

My reply is:

You are right there, and much of the industry is devoted to dhahahahating wanton sluts instead of pretty girls. Beauty is a holy thing, cum guzzling is gutter fare that rots mind and soul alike.

Steffie wrote:

I personally know some webmasters who will only date models, lookers!
Don't you guys want a family?

Maybe I am just getting old, (having boys in their 20's who are not webmasters) but looking at the girlfriends of my boys, they are not model material but will make great wives, mothers and lifetime companions.

What are you young webmaster males looking for in a girlfriend?

My reply is:

I think you need to listen to the Tom Leykis show on the radio. If it's on the are locally, tune it in and listen to it for a few weeks. Basically, until a man is ready to settle down, women are basically booty calls.

Steffie wrote:

Looks only will not get you happiness, keep that in mind next time you beat on a girl,. Keep in mind that in 20 years you probably won't have a family, life companion and partner if you don't change your view on women.

There is a real world out there, maybe some of you webmasters need to get out more, go to real clubs, not webmaster conventions

My reply is:

For men, women are sex objects. For women, men are success objects. Also, women have some weird attitudes themselves. I remember the 20/20 show several years ago that showed that women have a preference for height the way men have one for beauty. Only the female love for wealthy partners could overcome a height deficit. They were shown a number of equally physically attractive men of varying heights, and the women's preferences seemed very closely related to the height of the men. Only when told that the shortest man was quite wealthy did their interest in him increase.

04-03-2003, 07:13 PM
UnseenWorld Confirmed User Join Date: May 2001 Location: Portland, OR, USA Posts: 5,279	Steffie wrote: Over the past 7 years on the net I noticed that.. More and more girls are perfect looking. When most of us amateurs started out in 95-96 there wasn't much in adobe, digital photography etc. How does this affect our young men? My reply is: I'm in no respect a young webmaster, but I have some comments to contribute. Standards in modeling are high, and are not driven by webmasters but by the market. Back in the beginnings of modern porn, in the 60's and 70's, porn "models" were mainly 25-to-30ish hookers or hippies (and looking at vintage porn from that period, you can usually guess which of those pools the model came from). Today, the girls I shoot are usually 18-to-20ish college coeds. Or course, my work is largely devoted to "natural" girls, not showgirls, pornstars, or "babes," so maybe the girls I shoot are not what you are talking about. Contrary to the doctrine and wishes of the feminists, certain standards of beauty seem to be ingrained or "hard-wired" and are not as "cultural" as once thought. Given a choice between two strange women, a baby will almost invariably crawl toward the one with the face that is more conventionally beautiful. Proponents of a certain fetish area aside, men almost universally prefer young women to more mature women as sex partners. Speaking for myself, working with attractive and naked young women all the time probably has had an effect on me. I cannot find many women anywhere near my age (57) attractive. We can be friends and even very close friends, but do I have sexual desire for any women near my age? None. Nothing could be more human than to seek perfection, and perfection in terms of physical beauty is an enjoyment unto itself, merely in the observation. And here I'm speaking of the part of the adult world which is devoted to beauty. I'm not speaking of the fuck and suck area, which I happen to feel is perverse. If that part of the adult world were to disappear overnight, I would not shed a single tear. Steffie wrote: Yeah reckon a lot of them have money, but most of you guys are overweight and really have no clue how to treat women. My reply is: You are right there, and much of the industry is devoted to dhahahahating wanton sluts instead of pretty girls. Beauty is a holy thing, cum guzzling is gutter fare that rots mind and soul alike. Steffie wrote: I personally know some webmasters who will only date models, lookers! Don't you guys want a family? Maybe I am just getting old, (having boys in their 20's who are not webmasters) but looking at the girlfriends of my boys, they are not model material but will make great wives, mothers and lifetime companions. What are you young webmaster males looking for in a girlfriend? My reply is: I think you need to listen to the Tom Leykis show on the radio. If it's on the are locally, tune it in and listen to it for a few weeks. Basically, until a man is ready to settle down, women are basically booty calls. Steffie wrote: Looks only will not get you happiness, keep that in mind next time you beat on a girl,. Keep in mind that in 20 years you probably won't have a family, life companion and partner if you don't change your view on women. There is a real world out there, maybe some of you webmasters need to get out more, go to real clubs, not webmaster conventions My reply is: For men, women are sex objects. For women, men are success objects. Also, women have some weird attitudes themselves. I remember the 20/20 show several years ago that showed that women have a preference for height the way men have one for beauty. Only the female love for wealthy partners could overcome a height deficit. They were shown a number of equally physically attractive men of varying heights, and the women's preferences seemed very closely related to the height of the men. Only when told that the shortest man was quite wealthy did their interest in him increase. __________________ SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.