Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigsPimp
Probably my fault for going with a 'discount' designer in the first place. I scrapped the entire design by Sarah/Zuzana for which we agreed $1400 and I paid $900 of that. And with nothing to show for it at all.
I'm having my dating site redesigned by a top-notch design firm for $5k so at least I can get the right look for the site.
I shopped Sarah's design to everyone on my team and they all agreed it was pretty poor. I can post screenshots of the two and you decide.
if the milk turns out to be sour, i aint the kind of pussy to drink it
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigsPimp
|
Although I don't think it's worth $1400, I do think it's a nice design and very web2.0ish.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigsPimp
Not true. I paid $900 of a $1400 job for my new dating site called LoveRanger.
Sorry Zuzana, and it's nothing personal, but I'm not happy with the design. That's just how it goes. I paid $900 for a design I didn't use. So I'm out $900 and you didn't get an extra $500. Who do you think is worse off?
|
So in your words, PimpMansion wasn't satisfied with your joins and decided to cut their loss and not pay you $5,000. So you really shouldn't be bitching about that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CraigsPimp
and by the way, GFY has banned all the email addresses and IPs of CraigsPimp users, so none of our happy affiliates can even come here and tell people honestly what the program is about ...
way to go, just ban people you don't know, to try and ruin the reputation of a legitimate enterprise.
|
And I also find this hard to believe. First off, how do they know all the CraigsPimp users email address'? Did you supply a list to them to ban? and if that's so, wouldn't they have banned you also?
Or do you mean they banned the craigspimp.com domain name from registering, thus stopping you from registering a few fake nicks to back you up?