Quote:
Originally Posted by XXXMovie4M
minor damage to WTC 7 jackass! the buildings were built to withstand a direct plane strike but WTC 7 had "minor" damage compared to it's structure but yet it crumbled like a deck of cards. how could such minimal damage to WTC 7 cause it to just collapse like a text book demo job. before you open your big trap, watch a demo job, then watch WTC 7 coming down and tell me what the difference is.
and, if these buildings did collapse from an aircraft hit then why wasn't the engineering firm sued? they were designed for it!
|
Where do you get your info exactly you stupid fuck? Let me guess from lunatic conspiracy sites? Please gives us some facts about minror damage. In the meantime i'll post this:
In its progress report, NIST released a video and still-photo analysis of 7 World Trade Center before its collapse that appears to indicate a greater degree of structural damage from falling debris than originally assumed by FEMA. Specifically, NIST's interim report on 7 World Trade Center displays photographs of the southwest façade of the building that show it to have significant damage. The report also highlights a 10-story gash in the center of the south façade, toward the bottom, extending approximately a quarter of the way into the interior.[3][40] A unique aspect of the design of 7 World Trade Center was that each outer structural column was responsible for supporting 2,000 sq ft (186 m²) of floor space, suggesting that the simultaneous removal of a number of columns severely compromised the structure's integrity.[41] Consistent with this theory, news footage shows cracking and bowing of the building's east wall immediately before the collapse, which began at the penthouse floors.[3] In video of the collapse, taken from the north by CBS News and other news media, the first visible sign of collapse is movement in the east penthouse 8.2 seconds before the north wall began to collapse, which took at least another 7 seconds.[3][42]