Quote:
Originally Posted by After Shock Media
Can I ask just two very simple questions, think about them before you answer and please do answer.
1. If the government wanted to take out the buildings for whatever reason. Why go through such an elaborate set of events when everyone knows to keep things simple. People are saying explosives, etc. Would it not of been easier and a whole lot more simple if the government used some suicide bombers and a few vehicle bombs to do this act? Then they could still lay the same blame, have less chances of things going wrong, have to rely on fewer people, and of course could use explosives.
2. Lets just say the government was behind it in some way, fashion, whatever. Perhaps they had prior evidence and did not react in time, do not care. Now what? What do you think people should do or could do?
|
1) because there's too much security for another ground attack on the towers. and, i doubt anyone would believe a vehicle bomb could take the buildings down. even though the buildings were designed to withstand a direct hit from an airliner people still believe the "pancake" theory. i think the attack had to be very visual and horrific images needed to be burned into the minds of the american people. the government even staged an attack on one of their own buildings as a smoke screen.
2) i'm not sure what you mean by "Now what? What do you think people should do or could do?"