Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty F
Come on...anybody? These 2 arguments are 2 of the most used as "proof" of the conspiracy.
It's kinda weird if nobody can actually explain them.
|
kinda silly questions... didn't care to waste my time on them, but I have a few minutes now so here we go...
Quote:
|
I keep asking and nobody responds. You idiots keep crying about how the tower fell down straight which according to you means it was because of explosives. So then please answer me how else would've it have fallen down if it wasn't bombed? What was it supposed to do then?
|
buildings always fall down straight? really? Go learn a bit more about demolition companies and the work they do... There are actually techniques to make a building fall in their footprint... It doesn't just automatically happen..
Quote:
And also no answer why the debris falls faster than the building. So the debris is actually falling faster than free fall speed?
Give me some answers so i can understand you great minds.
|
I think people are saying "near free fall speed" not "free fall speed" ...
Hope I cleared things up for you...