Quote:
Originally Posted by XXXMovie4M
the complete collapse of WTC 7 is the evidence! this would not and could not happen.
this is where they fucked up. people obviously believe WTC 1 & 2 could collapse from impact and fire, but there is no reason why 7 would collapse like a perfectly executed demo job.
why did the fire department tell the owner of the building that there was too much damage and they had to "pull" the building. he admitted to this so it's a fact.
it takes weeks of carefull planning by a team of professionals to "pull" a building, not just a few hours during total chaos.
this is the smoking gun and that's why in the 500+ page "9/11 commision report" there's not one line dedicated to it's collapse. there's no logical explanation for it.
|
You're spinning half truths around a single word "pull". No fire department has ever admited to "pulling the building" in any fashion. You're just seeing what you want to see, no what's true. Your facts are just made up shit.
Quote:
|
The most important operational decision to be made that afternoon was the collapse (Of the WTC towers) had damaged 7 World Trade Center, which is about a 50 story building, at Vesey between West Broadway and Washington Street. It had very heavy fire on many floors and I ordered the evacuation of an area sufficient around to protect our members, so we had to give up some rescue operations that were going on at the time and back the people away far enough so that if 7 World Trade did collapse, we [wouldn't] lose any more people. We continued to operate on what we could from that distance and approximately an hour and a half after that order was [given], at 5:30 in the afternoon, World Trade Center collapsed completely" - Daniel Nigro, Chief of Department
|
Quote:
|
"Early on, there was concern that 7 World Trade Center might have been both impacted by the collapsing tower and had several fires in it and there was a concern that it might collapse. So we instructed that a collapse area -- (Q. A collapse zone?) -- Yeah -- be set up and maintained so that when the expected collapse of 7 happened, we wouldn't have people working in it. There was considerable discussion with Con Ed regarding the substation in that building and the feeders and the oil coolants and so on. And their concern was of the type of fire we might have when it collapsed." - Chief Cruthers
|
And finally, no it was not an undamaged building with small fires:
Quote:
|
"A little north of Vesey I said, we?ll go down, let?s see what?s going on. A couple of the other officers and I were going to see what was going on. We were told to go to Greenwich and Vesey and see what?s going on. So we go there and on the north and east side of 7 it didn?t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn?t look good.
|