Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty F
Honestly, it wouldn't surprise me if they let this happen in one way or another. It was a great excuse to invade Iraq again (or at least they made it an excuse while obviously Iraq had nothing to with it) and basically start a war against anything middle east (they can use the 9/11 attacks forever as an excuse to invade middle eastern countries where muslim terrorists are). These attacks had a lot of benefits for some people. So yes, that's very possible but Bush and his buddies behind the attacks...nah, simply not possible. Just the amount of people that would've been involved makes it impossible.
|
I would mostly agree except I'd say nothing is
impossible, just very
improbable.
Is it possible that controlled demolitions were used? Sure, in the absence of indusputable evidence like a frame by frame x-ray series of the entire buildings collapse, then we can only examine the evidence and say what most probably happened.
The number of people and the logistics required to wire those buildings up for controlled demolitions that had to perform flawlessly even after being hit by a plane and be kept an absolute secret just make it very, very improbable that this is what happened. Abigious "flashes" of a collapsing building and single words out of complex like "pull" does not change this. These things are not evidence.
We don't know for sure what happened that day, especially when it comes to motives, intelligence and involvment but any sane person can rule out ridiculous concepts like holographic planes and pop culture references.