Quote:
Originally Posted by hershie
The buildings were not constructed the same way and the report never said the damage to the lower floors was why it collapsed and it didn't come down like a textbook demolition pull. Just please have a look at the NIST Q&A http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/f...qa_082108.html and refute the actual findings, not what you say they said. |
so if buildings are all completely different in construction, how can a demolition company possibly determine the outcome of a building pull? each pull would be a hit or miss.
it doesn't matter what the NIST report says. show me a report from an independant organization unrelated to the US government. people say it collpased because of damage to the bottom floors, others say it was from fire. it doesn't matter, buildings aren't designed to collapse straight down into their own footprint at free-fall speeds. how can a building do that without the help of explosives?
if the building collpased, it would have done it in stages as each floor pancaked into the next. the only way to get a building to collpase like that is to use perfectly placed explosives and blow out each floor to remove the support. if a building could collpase by knocking out the bottom floors, then why don't demo companies use that method? why do they set explosive on every floor?
fire would not have caused the building to collapse. it has never happened before and will never happen again.