Originally Posted by Pleasurepays

i agree with you completely. but this is also the problem of this sort of insanity. as you know, you need all the evidence to make a determination and all of the evidence must be viewed in its proper context and in its entirety. you can't take a single important piece of information from dozens or hundreds and proclaim it as "proof" of something if your going to ignore any and all evidence that doesn't support that conclusion.

was WTC demo'ed? sure. probably. why not? would or should the government be honest about the destruction of a CIA office, its records, equipment etc or IRS office or all of the other important offices in that building? i don't agree they should. would we all be better off if they admitted to bringing that building down on purpose.. but not the others? doubtful. i think these arguments would be 10 times worse. and I don't think its a reasonable thing to create anarchy as an alternative.

furthermore, i personally tend to believe these discussions to be highly corrosive and destructive on the whole. "don't believe anything "they" tell you" is not exactly a tenet of a healthy, well functioning society (or individual for that matter). in fact, its the opposite. at its core, it undermines a society. should people not ask questions? of course they should. that's healthy. should people be running wild with impossible conspiracy theories, demanding that you be equally paranoid and distrustful of anyone in a position of authority? no... i don't think so.