Quote:
Originally Posted by XXXMovie4M
sure, i'd love to comment on this.
first of all it seems larry's words are being twisted after the fact from meaning "pulling the firefighters from the building" to "pulling the building down using cables and equipment". it would be impossible to pull a building down within it's own footprint using cables. if this works then demolition teams waste time and money by precisley setting explosives in order to destroy the supporting floors.
secondly, this was the largest crime scene in our history. do you think that wrecking crews would be allowed to start pulling buildings down shortly after the crime happened? is that the first step in a crime scene investigation? bring in a clean up crew so the investigators have a nice working environment before starting?
what was the urgency to "pull" WTC 7? with victims still trapped in the rubble, do you think that was the priority?
does this really look like the work of cables?
|
Don't you think it may be a little intellectually dishonest to selectively take out only the most trivial evidence and testimony...that you can argue against out of that link and ignore the other 98% of solid video evidence and first hand commentary.
And to think of the 2 or 3 things you do pick out of that link out of the hundreds of evidence points against your position, saying that Silverstein's bad choice of words equals he was able to dictate to the FDNY what to do that day is ludicrous , never mind the dozen of so firefighters including the chief who tells you what happened around that episode in the link.
Doesn't it clearly show videos and pics showing it couldn't be a controlled demolition by the way it fell - it didn't even fall into its own footprint at all - nice only showing the fall from one side of the building - the penthouses went first...and they show bulging in the building and how so much damage was done to one side of the building that the photo of after the building fell shows it fell towards that side that gave out.