GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post - Do 2257 regulations promote the "user uploaded" tube model?

BFT3K · 04-24-2009, 12:33 PM

Most of today's porn tube sites are NOT user uploaded, so yes, they SHOULD be subjected to the same 2257 inspections that any other porn site is open to. I hope it happens soon in fact.

As far as the 2 types of people on GFY goes; there are guys who actually spend lots of time, effort, and risk, actually PRODUCING something, and we HATE the idea that this content is somehow expected to be given away for free - and then there are those who produce NOTHING and think it is fine to profit from other people's hard work.

Notice the guys who complain about tube bashing never have sigs that represent their own work? They are just users, so they can't understand how absurd the porn-for-free business model really is.

Don't worry. Things will be changing soon. One 2257 inspection can stop most of it in its tracks (for example).

04-24-2009, 12:33 PM
BFT3K Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Narnia Posts: 10,764	Most of today's porn tube sites are NOT user uploaded, so yes, they SHOULD be subjected to the same 2257 inspections that any other porn site is open to. I hope it happens soon in fact. As far as the 2 types of people on GFY goes; there are guys who actually spend lots of time, effort, and risk, actually PRODUCING something, and we HATE the idea that this content is somehow expected to be given away for free - and then there are those who produce NOTHING and think it is fine to profit from other people's hard work. Notice the guys who complain about tube bashing never have sigs that represent their own work? They are just users, so they can't understand how absurd the porn-for-free business model really is. Don't worry. Things will be changing soon. One 2257 inspection can stop most of it in its tracks (for example).