Quote:
Originally Posted by Sands
Actually, you were the first to make this argument about sexuality as you elected to present your views about what sexual orientation you need to be in order to be sexually attracted to transsexuals. So conversely, I suppose YOU felt the need to bring sexuality into the mix.
I see that you like to reference evolution for whatever reason, most likely as a way to invoke the idea that homosexuals or transsexuals are inferior as they cannot reproduce (since the bulk of your responses are routinely deprecating). And again, you're exhibiting a rather narrow view of sexual selection and evolved psychological mechanisms. If we have the brain structure and resulting consciousness that allows us a fluid gender or fluid sexuality, then this has more than likely developed over many successive generations and may lend to our species' fitness. At any rate, your presumptions are deeply flawed as you automatically assume homosexual and transsexual individuals do not want to have children and that they can't have children. They can, actually, and they do, actually.
As far as your insistence of "closet homosexuality", this is more than likely a result of your black and white reasoning. Anything that may not fall into your ying and yang outlook is automatically suspect. This is ignorance, plain and simple, which is a shame because you seem like an intelligent person otherwise. The inflexible mind is a dogmatic mind, and the dogmatic mind creates an automaton.
Men who are looking for a woman with a penis are, essentially, looking for a woman with a penis. Note the "woman" part of that sentence. And I'm not sure who the "we" is that you're referring to, but "we" over here understand that it IS heterosexuality, and not homosexuality.
I can appreciate your viewpoint but I sincerely disagree with it.
|
Well there are certainly men that are attacted to both men and women and there are certainly women attracted to both men and women. Bi sexuality as it's called is the gray area between hetro and homo sexuality. It still doesn't make a man dressed as a woman a woman, no matter what their brains might think of the situation.
Consider if you will what future Archaeologists would think when confronted with the skeleton of a transexual and some DNA matter. Sex would be determined purely from the physical characteristics with no thought to how the person dressed or what sex they considered themselves to be in their minds. It's really that simple I'm afraid. Sexuality does not transcend gender IMHO.
As for the evolution argument, I make that one in gest all the time and you've probably seen me do it in other threads. It's important to note that I didn't bring up evolution here first, it was brought up and I countered the ridiculous argument with this ridiculous counter. Of course homosexuality is not evolution trying to weed out dead ends, it's a wholey ridiculous argument and that was kind of the point.