View Single Post
Old 05-26-2009, 11:16 AM  
webmasterchecks
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,685
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveHardeman View Post
Well, I'm always open to being wrong but the only way I see it being a conflict of interest is if the interest is the truth.

I mean, fuck, it's only $160. I'm just saying that this can be solved quickly and without question in one simple post. Corvette posting the truth without both parties agreeing to have the truth posted would definitely be a violation of trust but if both ask for it, I see nothing wrong with it.
ccbill would never post something like that.

what they do is they monitor the fraud on the accounts, if they are suspicious about transactions they contact the client so their client can fix it.

its up to the client to handle it if they think its needed, and if the clients account has a chargeback problem, they will terminate them

so in this case, some transactions may have been "suspicious" and they contacted the webmaster, who terminated the affiliate/crossells (even if they may be legitimate) in order to not risk their account being turned off

fraud is rarely black and white, you have to make decisions sometime playing the odds, but they are wrong. but thats the game
__________________
Webmasterchecks Affiliate Payments - fully compatible with nats/mpa3

Last edited by webmasterchecks; 05-26-2009 at 11:18 AM..
webmasterchecks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote