Quote:
Originally Posted by SABAI
i don't deny that he doesn't deserve to get paid , i say the guy is an idiot for bringing it to the boards. especially for 105$ and since nothing proves that he didn't get paid anyway... as said curious, in 2004 they were with ccbill , why doesn't the moron contact CCbill instead of opening flaming thread on every webmasters board?
i just received a check of 76$ from ccbill from sales made in 2005-2006 from sponsors that i do not advertise anymore , and i asked nicely , they sent it even thought it didn't meet the 100$ minimum.... i didn't go to the boards and whine about not receiving my checks.
more over the numbers you quoted came in the 30est post or around, while he said himself that the 105$ were due in 2004 in his third post.
|
He tried contacting them for five weeks and got no response. Only when he brought it to the boards after attempting to contact the program in every way he knew how did the program finally look into it.
He probably mentioned 2004 in the emails because he was explaining the situation and his using statsremote; his search using that program was from 2004 forward I'm guessing, I don't for sure without having seen the email. But those are the very communications you're being critical of the guy for not making. What is the affiliate supposed to do when a program doesn't respond, just take it in the ass? He brought it public and good for him and us he did, so we can see the ethics of this program owner too.
Regardless of when sales are made and how long a program sits on affliates who haven't yet hit their minimum, once the affiliate makes the minimum payment amount, they need to get paid. Accounting is from the existence of the program and not any other date, as CCBill gladly accounted for you in your situation under $100.