Originally Posted by Silver Sinema Parker

Described by AIM administrator Brooke Hunter as "a video performer," the female performer tested positive from a blood draw on June 4. The results were received June 6. The performer's last negative test was April 29. She had previously been described as being in "a small number of films," which would explain the 36-day gap between tests.

It never mentioned anyone else that she might have worked with in May while her last negative test was valid. That means that she might have gotten infected sometime in and around the 29th. Or possibly before then and it was not detected--doesn't mean that she was not infected. The DNA/pcr test can detect within time of exposure to 3 weeks. She could have been infected up to 3 weeks before her last negative test--though unlikely and unlikely to pass it on. Am I missing something here? Did she not work at all during the month of May and did she not have sex with anyone during that time? She must have at least once, right?