Quote:
Originally posted by SpaceAce
The very fact that a Grand Jury did not indict smacks of corruption and influence. Anyone familiar with the workings of an American Grand Jury knows that the famous syaing about being able to get a Grand Jury to indict a ham sandwich is very true. Your child found dead in your own home, murdered while you were present, should have been sufficient for an indictment in the hands of any competent prosecutor.
SpaceAce
|
A prosecuter would not want an indictment handed down if he did not have enough evidence to win the case and the prosecuter at that point in time later said that he did not have enough evidence to win the case. An equittal would mean that they could never be tried again.
I for one do not believe that either one of the Ramseys had anything to do with the death of their daughter.