Quote:
Originally Posted by mikesouth
AIM created this problem themselves
when asked they lied. had they been forthright this wouldnt have blown up. they compounded the problem and made people dig deeper, now they are going to diog very deep and AIM has only themselves to blame.
|
Follow the trail of disclosure.
Nina came on here with information that should not have been released in first place. AIM handled the other cases in a very private, very confidential fashion.
When people who are outside of the medical industry get access to information of that nature, they should respect medical protocol.
It doesn't matter what degrees anyone involved in this matter has. We are talking about a facility that has specific guidelines that protect this industry.
When hacks get involved we end up with the mess that we currently have.
It should have been handled just as the other cases were. There were no outbreaks in those other positive cases and there most likely will not be one with this case.
Unfortunately with all of these industry people making their own assumptions about something that they shouldn't have been privy to in the first place, the situation has been blown out of proportion.
Discretion is the greater part of valor and those in this industry who went ahead and exposed things that they had no clue of dealing with need to be reprimanded.