Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtyWhiteBoy
Dave,
Based on AIMS response to Roy, AMA Joe and the other agent calling them and asking if there was a + performer, and being told no. That is the lie I'm talking about. They tried to cover it up until the story grew too big.
They could have just said, "yes, there is a performer but we can't give their name" but they didn't. They said, "no" to a couple of people.
Where I'm from, that's a lie.
|
Thanks---I didn't know that the above had occured.
Who is "Roy"?
I wonder, though, since the AIM testing takes a day or two for the actual lab (AIM is not the actual lab doing the testing, rather they only draw the blood and maintain the Chain of Custody and tracking while sending it to the actual lab), if the processing time between drawing the blood, getting it and the patient documentation to the actual lab, and getting the lab results back might have been such that the delay AND/OR ANY FEDERAL/STATE REPORTING LAWS were the reason why it seemed like someone "lied" (or, wasn't aware, and made an honest mistake?); or, if the laws required that "confirmatory" test results be obtained before giving Roy and Joe and the public info---those confirmatory tests took some time to complete, right???????