Originally Posted by Profits of Doom

See this is the kind of shit that drives me insane. The LA Times is so much more interested in selling newspapers than they are factually reporting a story. I'm not siding with AIM until I know all the facts, but it doesn't help anyone when, in their rush to print a sensational story, The La Times runs with inaccurate information, and then goes back and researches it properly. Meanwhile everyone remembers the sensational headline, and no one actually pays any attention when they print their tiny retraction...