View Single Post
Old 06-23-2009, 01:04 PM  
TMM_John
Confirmed User
 
TMM_John's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 6,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by borked View Post
You misunderstood - I certainly didn't mean to imply people are moving away in droves, just a few here and there that I deal with. And the other side of the coin is testament to that, where new nats customers are asking me for help. So there are clearly new joiners as well as some moving away. But that's what competition drives - one unit opens and of course there are some who are going to say "hey, that's better suited for me because of xyz".

I was just wondering if a Lite version may in fact bring in more people as an entry level solution.
I didn't think you were trying to be negative with the thread. We're already offering a better software at a lower price tho. $150/mo for the product we provide is a bargain.

I'm sure a lite version would bring in people that aren't on board now, but its a matter of whether or not a product as complicated as even a stripped down version of NATS would be makes sense to offer at say $75/mo.

I have toyed with the idea of say a CCBill limited NATS which would be limited to using CCBill only, provide non-cascading type functionality, and utilize CCBill for payments, but at this point, with the growth we are experiencing it doesn't make sense for us to dedicate the time it would take to roll that out vs. the demand we see for it. Of course, who knows what the future might bring.
TMM_John is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote