Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
but the wolverine movie was not one of the pieces of content referenced in the case
so again your talking about convicting them based on infractions outside the scope of the trial.
How can you believe that is fair.
They knocked down the proof that they were involved in all the transactions they were accused of.
|
I use the wolverine movie as an example that they are providing links to a movie that when downloaded is done so illegally. As I said, I didn't follow the trial day by day and line by line. I don't know what was put forth and what wasn't. I don't know what was knocked down and what wasn't. With a trial a lot of is perspective. How many times has someone gotten convicted of something and said that the prosecution gave no proof of guilt while the prosecution says they gave plenty of proof? It happens all the time.
The Pirate Bay is involved in illegal activity. The Wolverine movie is simply an example of that. As I said in the previous post when you operate in a gray area and eventually someone calls you out on it sometimes you win and sometimes you lose. If there truly was no proof of their guilt then they have nothing to worry about and when the case goes to appeal it will either be tossed out or the verdict will be set aside.